Commercial Drones PilotsBest and worst states for drone operations

August 6, 2021by helo-10
https://coreheli.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Drones-best-states-ranking.jpg


If you are a commercial drone operator – or hope to be one – the best state for you is probably North Dakota. You definitely don’t want to set up operations in Kentucky.

Those two states ranked first and last, respectively, on a new report from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. The report, “Which States are Prepared for the Drone Industry? A 50-State Report Card, Release 2.0,” was written by Brent Skorup and Connor Haaland. The research is an attempt to identify which states are best prepared for commercial drone adoption and suggests states create “drone highways,” situated right above existing public roads.

“Many states have laws that allow cities to lease the air rights above public roads, vest air rights with property owners and establish avigation easements. With these laws, states can facilitate future drone operations in low-altitude airspace while Congress and the Federal Aviation Administration develop national drone policies. Creating a clear and coherent framework at the state and local level, such as a system of drone highways, will make parcel delivery faster, improve distribution of medical supplies and create technology and logistics jobs,” the authors noted.

The report judged states on five criteria:

  • Airspace lease law.
  • Law vesting air rights with landowners.
  • Avigation easement law.
  • Drone task force or program office.
  • Drone jobs estimates.

The report noted that in September 2020, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) stated it was unclear how federal and state governments will share authority over low-altitude airspace. At the end of December, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued new rules that require unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) to broadcast identification or location information and allow operators of small drones to fly over people and vehicles, and at night under certain conditions. The next major step toward integration is developing rules for beyond-visual-line-of-sight operations, which currently require a waiver.

Read: New FAA rules put drone delivery closer to reality

In January, American Robotics Inc., based in Marlborough, Massachusetts, said it had been approved for operation for its Scout System drones, including for operation beyond-visual-line-of-sight of the operator.

The Mercatus report said states should prepare to have more involvement in drone operations.

“States and cities have police powers over land use and zoning, and low-altitude airspace – where many drones will fly – is inseparable from the land beneath it,” the report stated. “Further, courts look to state law when determining whether approved flight paths amount to an unconstitutional taking of property. For practical and legal reasons, then, state and city authorities will play a key role in demarcating drone highways as well as in creating time, place and manner restrictions such as time-of-day rules, noise maximums and privacy protections.”

The authors suggested states work with the FAA to create drone highways above public rights-of-way to speed parcel delivery, inspections and other drone services.

“Leasing the aerial corridors above public roads would allow state and local authorities to manage drone highways for safe and efficient drone services. Exercising this power would also allow many authorities to receive passive income, through leasing or auction, from a currently unused public resource – the public right-of-way between 50 feet and 200 feet above the ground,” the authors wrote.

Read: FAA gives approval for drone operation outside operator’s line of sight

North Dakota, with an overall score of 70 on a 100-point scale, was deemed the state most ready for commercial deployment of drones. The authors noted state law already grants air rights to landowners, which will reduce litigation risk for drone operators, and the state has an avigation easement law, which means drone operators are protected from nuisance and trespass laws as long as their drones don’t disturb people on the ground. The state also has a drone program office – the Northern Plains Unmanned Systems Authority – in place to develop policies.

Kentucky, on the other hand, ranked last, scoring zero points in each criteria except the drone jobs estimate. The authors gave it 3 points for the estimated 5.5 drone-related jobs per 100,000 people in the state.

State rankings

The entire rankings with each state’s overall score, as determined by the Mercatus Center’s research, are below.

Rank State Overall Score Rank State Overall Score
1 North Dakota 70 26 Hawaii 35
2 Arkansas 69 26 New Hampshire 35
3 Oklahoma 64 28 Utah 34
4 Nevada 63 29 Michigan 33
5 Virginia 60 30 Ohio 32
6 Georgia 59 30 Oregon 32
6 North Carolina 59 32 Connecticut 28
8 New Jersey 55 33 Kansas 26
9 Delaware 54 34 Alaska 25
9 Texas 54 34 Louisiana 25
11 Minnesota 50 34 Pennsylvania 25
12 Wisconsin 49 37 Illinois 23
13 Arizona 48 38 Maine 17
13 California 48 39 Alabama 16
13 Wyoming 48 39 New York 16
16 Vermont 47 41 West Virginia 15
17 Washington 45 42 Florida 13
18 Montana 42 43 South Carolina 12
19 Idaho 40 44 New Mexico 11
19 Massachusetts 40 45 South Dakota 10
19 Tennessee 40 46 Nebraska 9
22 Maryland 39 46 Rhode Island 9
23 Colorado 38 48 Iowa 4
23 Missouri 38 48 Mississippi 4
25 Indiana 37 50 Kentucky 3

Click for more Modern Shipper articles by Brian Straight.

You may also like:

Social Auto Transport raises $1.5M in seed funding to expand gig economy auto-moving business

Bringg’s collaboration with Uber opens new doors for e-commerce

Walmart to begin drone delivery pilot this summer





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

There is more to being a drone pilot than just buying a machine and flying in your backyard. It can be that simple, but most of us will need to understand some drone laws before we try to take to the sky.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

    Objectively innovate empowered manufactured products whereas parallel platforms.